Another judge withdraws from Sarath N. Silva’s contempt case

Another judge withdraws from Sarath N. Silva’s contempt case

May 8, 2019   12:41 pm

Supreme Court Justice Prasanna Jayawardena today stepped down from the bench hearing the contempt of court case against former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva, citing personal reasons.

The petition was filed by Senior Professor Chandraguptha Thenuwara, Prof Hewa Waduge Cyril, and Prof Prashantha Gunawardene, stating that the statement made by the former Chief Justice during a meeting organized by the ‘Jathika Ekamuthuwa’ organization in Maradana on December 03, is in contempt of court.

Silva had allegedly expressed views regarding the court order issued against the gazette notification issued by the President dissolving the Parliament.

They have requested the Supreme Court to hear the case and to give a suitable sentence to former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva accordingly.

The case was taken up before Justices Murdhu Fernando, Gamini Amarasekara and Prasanna Jayawardena this morning (8).

Justice Prasanna Jayawardena stated in open court that he too was a member of the bench which had issued the court order in question, which is the basis for the defendant’s statement, and that therefore he does not wish to participate in this hearing.

Accordingly the Supreme Court stated that the petition will be considered before another judge bench on July 28.

Justice Priyantha Jayewardena had also recused himself from the hearing of the petition on February 07, 2019.

Disclaimer: All the comments will be moderated by the AD editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or slanderous. Please avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment and avoid typing all capitalized comments. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by flagging them(mouse over a comment and click the flag icon on the right side). Do use these forums to voice your opinions and create healthy discourse.



NOTE:- Due to legal contstraints, the Ada Derana Editorial team has taken a decision to disable comments on all articles concerning ongoing court procedures.

Most Viewed Video Stories