The US today expressed disappointment over Sri Lanka’s rejection of recommendations by UPR states calling for the implementation of the LLRC recommendations.
During the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) on Sri Lanka, a number of States had called for the implementation of the recommendations of Sri Lanka’s own Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), the delegation of the United States of America said at the 22nd Session Human Rights Council.
“We are disappointed that the Government rejected all UPR recommendations from States that called upon it to implement the LLRC recommendations,” Ambassador Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe said, delivering a statement at the adoption of the UPR Report on Sri Lanka.
The US also criticized the Sri Lankan delegation’s attempt to “reframe” Sri Lanka’s human rights commitments in terms of the government’s National Plan of Action, which it claims does not address the “broad spectrum of recommendations” put forward by the LLRC report.
The US also accused the Lankan delegation of lobbying other delegations to revise their UPR recommendations to exclude reference to the LLRC report, “after they had been orally presented”.
“Major changes were made to the substance of recommendations after the interactive dialogue. This is inconsistent with the transparent, interactive character of the UPR,” Ambassador Donahoe said commenting on Sri Lanka’s responses to the UPR review.
The US also stated that it was “disappointed” that the Sri Lankan Government rejected nearly all recommendations regarding engagement and cooperation with UN special procedures mandate holders.
“We urge the government to expeditiously implement both the UPR and LLRC recommendations,” Ambassador Donahoe said.
U.S. Statement at the Adoption of the UPR Report on Sri Lanka
We welcome the Government’s statement of its intention to accept recommendations to combat gender-based violence, to carry out an independent and credible investigation into the allegations of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, and to strengthen the independence of institutions, including the Human Rights Commission, Police Commission, and Election Commission.
During the review, a number of States called for the implementation of the recommendations of Sri Lanka’s own Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC). We are disappointed that the Government rejected all UPR recommendations from States that called upon it to implement the LLRC recommendations.
Further, the Sri Lankan delegation attempted to reframe Sri Lanka’s human rights commitments in terms of the government’s National Plan of Action, which does not address the broad spectrum of recommendations put forward by the LLRC report, and by lobbying other delegations to revise their UPR recommendations to exclude reference to the LLRC report after they had been orally presented.
Major changes were made to the substance of recommendations after the interactive dialogue. This is inconsistent with the transparent, interactive character of the UPR.
We are also disappointed that the Government rejected nearly all recommendations regarding engagement and cooperation with UN special procedures mandate holders.
We urge the government to expeditiously implement both the UPR and LLRC recommendations.
