Latest
Darrell Hair makes controversial remarks on Murali
Oct 14, 201402:50 PM
Darrell Hair, the umpire who famously no-balled Muttiah Muralitharan in a Boxing Day Test, says cricket’s crackdown on illegal bowling actions has come 20 years too late, leaving the game with “a generation of chuckers”.
“It’ll be interesting to see how many umpires are brave enough to get involved in it. I said it in the late ‘90s that if something wasn’t done about it you’d have a generation of chuckers on your hands and now you have. They try to emulate Harbajan Singh and Saqlain Mushtaq and Murali and that’s the problem. The crackdown should have happened on those players and the ICC should have let it be known that it wasn’t acceptable.”
“People say ‘you should be happy with the way things turned out’...with the chuckers being weeded out. But it doesn’t give me any personal satisfaction whatsoever,” Hair said. ”All I was doing at any time was just doing my job and I think I did it to the best of my ability. The fact was that no other ICC umpires were willing to have a go. Ross Emerson was very adamant about his thoughts about chuckers but they soon put him into the background.
The Australian has watched with interest as a succession of leading bowlers led by Pakistan spinner Saeed Ajmal have been suspended from international cricket or reported in an unprecedented purge.
The absence of Ajmal for the upcoming Test series against Australia in the United Arab Emirates is a huge blow for Pakistan but Hair predictably has little sympathy, instead taking aim at the ICC for being soft on one of the game’s most vexed issues for too long. ”Whatever they’re doing now, they’re doing 20 years too late,” he said.
“They had a chance in 1995 to clean things up and it’s taken them 19 years to finally come back and say they want chuckers out of the game. I can’t believe that Saaed Ajmal has been able to bowl as long as he has, and they say he is bending his arm by 45 degrees [the legal limit is 15 degrees] or something. Well, every man and his dog would have known that.
“Since that time the umpires have felt more confident to report their concerns with certain bowlers, and their concerns have been supported by the results of the testing of these reported bowlers., smh reports”
