header logo
SLIC
Latest
Trump tariff refunds begin after Supreme Court order
Apr 20, 202608:30 PM
Trump tariff refunds begin after Supreme Court order
Mobitel inner 1278

The Trump administration has begun processing refunds for billions of dollars in tariffs that the US Supreme Court struck down in February.

 

In what is to be the biggest repayment programme in history, companies can apply online for money they were charged under the so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs - plus interest - to be returned.

 

The US Court of International Trade in March ordered customs officials to refund the more than $160bn (£121bn) the government had collected, putting roughly 330,000 importers in a position to potentially win back some money.

 

But some individual consumers, who were hit by the tariffs indirectly through higher prices, are not expected to be compensated.

 

The refunds relate to levies charged by US President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

 

“All importers of record whose entries were subject to IEEPA duties are entitled to the benefit” from the high court’s ruling, Judge Richard Eaton wrote in March.

 

As of early April, more than 56,000 importers had completed the necessary steps to apply for refunds online when the portal opened, with their claims worth $127bn (£943m).

 

The portal, known as the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (Cape), went live on Monday.

 

A Customs and Border Protection spokesperson said Cape had been built to “efficiently process refunds”.

 

The system will process refunds for importers as one lump sum, rather than making businesses apply item by item.

 

Customs and Border Protection said successful applicants can expect refunds, as well as any applicable interest, to be paid in 60 to 90 days.

 

A major issue with the process has been concerns raised by individual shoppers who faced higher prices as a result of Trump’s tariffs yet have no means to claim compensation themselves.

 

One way in which consumers could be compensated is by businesses disbursing any funds recouped from Customs and Border Protection to those affected, though few have announced plans to do so.

 

Individuals have begun filing class action lawsuits against companies they claim passed on the cost of Trump’s tariffs, arguing that any refunds businesses are paid should be passed on to consumers.

 

Federal cases have been filed against Ray-Ban maker EssilorLuxottica and FedEx, while a class-action lawsuit has been filed against Costco in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington.

 

Costco chief executive Ron Vachris has said the retailer plans to pass on any tariff refunds to customers “through lower prices and better values”.

 

The BBC spoke to lamp-maker Sue Johnson earlier this month, who said Trump’s tariffs prompted her supplier to double the cost of a key material used in her designs.

 

She expects no relief from the refund process.

 

“Maybe they’ll get repaid, but I have no hope they’re going to refund me,” she said.

 

The issue is complicated by the fact that while many importers raised their prices, they often did not do so by enough to fully offset the cost of the tariffs.

 

The tariffs also often triggered other kinds of costs, forcing businesses to take on debt to pay for the duties and leading to harder-to-quantify hits like lost sales.

 

Officials from the Trump administration have made it clear they do not expect consumers to benefit directly from the refunds.

 

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer last month urged companies that score a refund “windfall” to give it to workers in the form of bonuses. In February, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, suggested it was unlikely consumers would benefit.

 

“I got a feeling the American people won’t see it,” he said.

 

Source: BBC
-- Agencies

 

 

 

MostRead
Mobitel 1278
VideoStories
Randoli Perahera lights up streets of Kandy Devotees gather in numbers to witness the procession

Randoli Perahera lights up streets of Kandy Devotees gather in numbers to witness the procession

Over 70% Sri Lankans may back abolishing Executive Presidency; - Ex-Minister GL Peiris on Hyde Park

Over 70% Sri Lankans may back abolishing Executive Presidency; - Ex-Minister GL Peiris on Hyde Park

El Niño Impact: Prolonged dry spell affects 14 districts across Sri Lanka

El Niño Impact: Prolonged dry spell affects 14 districts across Sri Lanka

22nd Constitutional Amendment: Govt. says it has mandate for reforms, ITAK calls for referendum

22nd Constitutional Amendment: Govt. says it has mandate for reforms, ITAK calls for referendum

“Sri Lanka a promising partner for shared growth”  - Indonesian Ambassador to Sri Lanka

“Sri Lanka a promising partner for shared growth” - Indonesian Ambassador to Sri Lanka

Veteran lyricist Ven. Rambukana Siddhartha Thero  laid to rest today

Veteran lyricist Ven. Rambukana Siddhartha Thero laid to rest today

Public pay final respects to the late Nanda Malini Final rites tomorrow

Public pay final respects to the late Nanda Malini Final rites tomorrow

Petitions filed challenging constitutionality of  22nd Amendment Bill increase to 13

Petitions filed challenging constitutionality of 22nd Amendment Bill increase to 13

 Legendary Sri Lankan singer Dr. Nanda Malini passes away at 82

Legendary Sri Lankan singer Dr. Nanda Malini passes away at 82

UN receives public petition against alleged mistreatment of Suresh Sallay

UN receives public petition against alleged mistreatment of Suresh Sallay

Former President Ranil’s facts, data and interpretations are incorrect - Minister Anil Jayantha

Former President Ranil’s facts, data and interpretations are incorrect - Minister Anil Jayantha

Health officials warn public that prolonged heat exposure could be fatal

Health officials warn public that prolonged heat exposure could be fatal

 "Sri Lanka faces new economic crisis after 2028"; Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe warns

"Sri Lanka faces new economic crisis after 2028"; Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe warns

 BASL challenges 22A before SC; calls for full bench to examine the constitutionality of the bill

BASL challenges 22A before SC; calls for full bench to examine the constitutionality of the bill

Govt. ready for public referendum if ordered by SC, 22A Parliament debate in Sept. or Oct. – Nalinda

Govt. ready for public referendum if ordered by SC, 22A Parliament debate in Sept. or Oct. – Nalinda

Lassana Flora